AV俱乐部 the author: is a second-year PhD student at AV俱乐部 in the Department of Political Science.
Historically, the Prime Minister鈥檚 Office (PMO) has often made decisions in the absence of the opinions of citizens and other legislative bodies.
Since elected in 2015, Justin Trudeau鈥檚 Liberals have tried to re-brand the PMO and extinguish the notion of an in Canada鈥檚 federal government.
Once elected, the newly formed government published its guide for ministers, which focused on enabling many voices, having and becoming a
Though these initiatives appeared to be the foundation of the Trudeau government, his powerful first-term majority government didn鈥檛 keep many of these promises 鈥� a problem that鈥檚 always existed and persists regardless of political optics and re-branding efforts.
As was evident during the and the , decisions at the executive level are still apparently made in the absence of the opinions of citizens and other legislative bodies.
And though there are continuous efforts to brand the Trudeau government as and , centralized and executive power is as prevalent as ever at the federal level.
SNC-Lavalin
Most Canadians know the trials and tribulations of the SNC-Lavalin controversy; however, why did it come into the public light? The answer exists within and the ripple effect of Trudeau basing cabinet appointments on merit and gender representation 鈥� or, as he stated, 鈥�.鈥�
If party discipline does not exist, it can create contentious situations, exposing the executive dominance at the federal level 鈥� a situation that manifested with Jody Wilson-Raybould.
Read more:
If the Trudeau government had appointed a cabinet that practised party discipline, the SNC-Lavalin affair would be unknown to most Canadians. Wilson-Raybould was outside the norm of politics and disrupted the wishes of the PMO by interjecting independent decision-making.
Trudeau wrote in Wilson-Raybould鈥檚 mandate letter in 2015, However, it seems that support was contingent upon the particular wishes of the PMO being respected.
Trans Mountain pipeline
Though the SNC-Lavalin affair lays out a case of executive dominance within cabinet and Parliament, there are examples outside of the confines of Parliament Hill. When looking at the Trans Mountain pipeline debate, it鈥檚 evident that Trudeau is overstepping outside perspectives for his own objectives.
The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion was contingent upon that were primarily decided upon by the , an independent adjudication body. Even though the approval was contingent upon upholding the proposed conditions, the Trudeau government hastily , overlooking the recommendations of the National Energy Board and its public engagement initiatives.
The , stating the need for the National Energy Board to re-evaluate. As a response, the government superseded the National Energy Board with the internally managed , whose president is a former deputy national security adviser to Trudeau. To no surprise, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada reinstated the project and fulfilled the demands of the PMO.
Hypocrisy from the centre
The Trans Mountain pipeline debate ignored public engagement criteria. The Trudeau government has used a lack of public engagement to axe other campaign commitments.
Though Trudeau campaigned in 2015 on , the promise was broken once in power. The Liberals did appoint a , which unanimously agreed that citizen engagement was imperative to determining a new electoral system for Canada. It dedicated $300,000 for town halls to be conducted by each MP.
The electoral reform committee found that 71 per cent of Canadians who participated in surveys wanted parties to govern together and 80 per cent of town-hall meetings supported proportional representation.
Regardless of the committee recommendations, the Trudeau government decided to scrap electoral reform promises, stating that enough with the question of electoral reform. Rather than act on the recommendations for co-operative governance, the PMO made decisions in the absence of the opinions of citizens and other legislative bodies.
Shifting the setting
When looking at these examples, one might argue that these instances are rare. But actually, executive dominance is common; it just rarely comes into public light. With the lack of checks and balances, the position of prime minister is perhaps the .
It鈥檚 apparent now that claims of co-operative governance have just been mere brand attributes of the Trudeau government.
But Trudeau is going to have transform his brand into reality in the new minority government. Having to truly work in a co-operative government with other political parties might be the only chance to diminish executive dominance and implement policies that reflect the desires of Canadians.
which features includes relevant and informed articles written by researchers and academics in their areas of expertise and edited by experienced journalists.
AV俱乐部 is a founding partner of The Conversation Canada, an online media outlet providing independent, high-quality explanatory journalism. Originally established in Australia in 2011, it has had more than 85 commissioning editors and 30,000-plus academics register as contributors. A full list of articles written by AV俱乐部 academics can be found on聽